Hi Anze,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Anze wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> On Saturday 10 July 2010, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Actually, I am not that much interested in the patch per-se, I would just
> > > like to check the body of the check-response and compare it to a string
> > > for more reliable checks.
> >
> > It's what the patch does.
>
> Hmmm, I thought it was bigger...
It has been quite simplified with Nick's work on buffering server checks. I'd say that I too recalled a bigger one ;-)
> Ok, I'll take a look at it then. Thanks for updating the patch and for
> pointers on where to look for problematic sections.
>
> I can't promise it will be soon though, we have a lot of work right now... but
> I'll do my best.
You're welcome. Don't hurry anyway, this patch has been lying around for more than 1 year now, there's no emergency anymore !
Cheers,
Willy
Received on 2010/07/12 09:37
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2010/07/12 09:45 CEST