Re: Truncated health check response from real servers

Hi Willy,

On Saturday 10 July 2010, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Actually, I am not that much interested in the patch per-se, I would just
> > like to check the body of the check-response and compare it to a string
> > for more reliable checks.
>
> It's what the patch does.

Hmmm, I thought it was bigger...

> > I have included my original mail (and reasoning) on the
> > subject below. It's not on top of my priority list right now either,
> > still... sooner or later we might get bitten by it.
> >
> > I'd love to help out coding, but sockets and C++ are not my strong points
> > (though I am comfortable in C).
>
> So you're welcome, haproxy is plain C, and I don't understand C++ either
> ;-)

How did I miss that? :-D

Ok, I'll take a look at it then. Thanks for updating the patch and for pointers on where to look for problematic sections.

I can't promise it will be soon though, we have a lot of work right now... but I'll do my best.

Thanks,

Anze Received on 2010/07/12 09:28