On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:57:24AM +0100, David du Colombier wrote:
(...)
> A mistake in this function caused the return value of IPv4 to be
> inverted. Therefore the server address was incorrectly replaced
> by the address requested by the client.
Well spotted! Thanks for the fix, David, i've merged it into mainline.
Willy Received on 2011/03/22 14:39
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2011/03/22 14:45 CET