On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:40:15AM +0200, Cyril Bouthors wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2010, w#1wt.eu wrote:
>
> > that's one possibility. Many people use another method : they have one
> > "defaults" section for all HTTP settings, then they declare all their
> > HTTP sections, then a new "defaults" section for all TCP settings and
> > they declare their TCP sections. Since one defaults section completely
> > replaces the previous one for the following sections, you can easily
> > proceed that way.
>
> Or maybe we need a 'http defaults' section?
No, because there are people who already use different http defaults depending on applications. In fact what we need is to be able to explicitly indicate in a section what defaults section it relies on.
Willy Received on 2010/04/16 10:49
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2010/04/16 11:00 CEST