Have you perhaps incorrectly configured your SNMP tool to graph the
value as a gauge instead of a counter (I assume that the SNMP module
returns counters)? That would produce a continuously increasing graph.
As to the old processes still running there were some bugs that caused this issue which have now been resolved. I can't find the specific version that this bug is resolved in, but I have been affected by it in the past.
As Joseph asks, what version and OS?
-JohnF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Hardeman [mailto:jhardeman#colocube.com]
> Sent: June 30, 2009 9:00 PM
> To: Peter Miller
> Cc: haproxy#formilux.org
> Subject: Re: Rising number of connections
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> What version of Haproxy are you running and on what OS? Did
> you build from source or install the prebuilt binaries they
> provide? I do not see the same issue on the haproxies we are
> running, but I would be interested in the snmp plugins and
> scripts you are using to convert to rrdtool. If you can
> share them that is. If we could see them that might assist
> in figuring out the issue.
>
> Joe
>
> Peter Miller wrote:
>
> I monitor various statistics about HAProxy through a
> plugin in snmp, and oddly I'm seeing that the number of
> connections as reported by the front-end is increasing
> steadily, even though the traffic is up and down (predictably).
>
>
>
> This increase in number of connections is also reported
> in HAProxys stats page. If I restart HAProxy, the connection
> amount restarts from 0 and slowly risese over a couple of
> days... although, even though the new process ends up taking
> over the requests, the old processes are still running (I
> have about 4 now - is that normal?).
>
>
>
> See cacti graphs:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Many thanks for any help.
>
>
>
> Pete
>
>
> ** Please consider the environment before printing this
> e-mail **
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is of a
> confidential nature and is intended only for the addressee.
> If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure,
> copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be
> unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee,
> whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not intended to waive
> privilege or confidentiality. Internet communications are not
> secure and therefore Conde Nast does not accept legal
> responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or
> opinions expressed are those of the author.
>
> Company Registration details:
> The Conde Nast Publications Ltd
> Vogue House
> Hanover Square
> London W1S 1JU
>
> Registered in London No. 226900
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner
> <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner
> <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
> believed to be clean.
>
Received on 2009/07/02 21:08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2009/07/02 21:15 CEST