Re: HAProxy under 2.6 x64

Hello Willy,

Thanks for your quick reply. I've just re-tested this under 1.3.15.7 (on my other box) and using the command below it does compile successfully, so it would seem to only affect 1.2.18 - which doesnt seem to have the file structure you mentioned, I dont see a compat.h anywhere in the tarball.

I need to check whether using the compiled version solves the saturation issues I've had whilst running tests, with the CPU sitting at 100% and no further connections being accepted. I would be interested however in discussing my project with you off-list, I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on my theory (apologies for the obfuscation, but its not a protected idea currently).

Thanks,

Robert.

On 11 Feb 2009, at 22:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:10:04PM +0000, Robert Simmons wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I'm currently working on a project for my degree utilising HAProxy,
>> and I am having trouble getting it to compile under Fedora 9 x64
>> (2.6.27.9-73.fc9.x86_64). As it stands, the compilation bombs out on
>> compiling netfilter - but I am at a loss to explain why, or find the
>> solution other than "it doesn't work". Does anyone have HAProxy
>> running under x64 using the 2.6 kernel - if so, what distro and
>> version?
>>
>> Build Output:
>> [root#eskimo haproxy-1.2.18]# make TARGET=linux26 CPU=x64
>> gcc -Wall -I. -DNETFILTER -DENABLE_POLL -DENABLE_EPOLL -
>> DSTATTIME=0 -DTPROXY -g -c -o haproxy.o haproxy.c
>> In file included from haproxy.c:68:
>> /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:53: error: ?INT_MIN? undeclared
>> here (not in a function)
>> /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:64: error: ?INT_MAX? undeclared
>> here (not in a function)
>> make: *** [haproxy.o] Error 1
>
> Seems like netfilter is missing an include <limits.h> ...
>
> Either you fix it by hand in your netfilter_ipv4.h header, which is
> dirty and not a long-term solution, or you can insert "#include
> <limits.h>"
> in haproxy sources, let's say in include/common/compat.h for
> instance, as
> I think it will be loaded by all other files.
>
> If this works, please drop us a mail with the patch with a small
> comment,
> I'll merge it indicating it fixes build on this distro.
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>
Received on 2009/02/11 23:52