Re: Server response time discrepancy.

From: Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:37:58 +0200


On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:31:32PM -0600, Unai Rodriguez wrote:
> > Interestingly, there are some known bugs which were fixed in 1.2 since
> > this
> > very old 1.2.14 :
> >
> > - [MEDIUM] fix broken redispatch option
> > - [BUG] fix crash when no cookie is set on server
> > - [BUG] fix early server close after client close
> >
> > So if you really want to stay on version 1.2, please upgrade to 1.2.18.
> > Otherwise, I suggest that you switch to 1.3.14.6 or 1.3.15.2. 1.3.14 is
> > used a lot, and 1.3.15 is being progressively deployed at a large number
> > of places, so both are considered reliable, and possibly more than 1.2
> > since they're used by many more people.
> >
> > In fact, you can try 1.3.15.2 to see if anything changes for you. If it
> > does,
> > then you can also try 1.2.18 out of curiosity to see if it also fixes the
> > problems.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Willy
>
> Hey Willy,
>
> Thank you so much for the information. Any suggestion on what Linux kernel
> version to use along with haproxy 1.3.14.6 or 1.3.15.2?

Good results have been shown on 2.6.22 and 2.6.25. But under low to moderate performance, many people report success with 2.6.18 shipped in RHEL5 or CentOS 5.

Willy Received on 2008/07/01 07:37

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/07/01 07:46 CEST