Re: 100% CPU : hit a limit ?

From: Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:43:21 +0100


On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:11:39AM +0100, Patrick Viet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Willy Tarreau <w#1wt.eu> wrote:
>
> >
> > > Thanks for your insights, the CPU has gone back down to 5-6%
> >
> > Ah that's more in line with what's expected.
> > You're not the first one to get this problem. I think that we should prevent
> > the Makefile from building for a void target. It should yell and enumerate
> > the supported ones so that people have no excuse for not setting the right
> > one.
>
> Very good idea, I'll be looking forward to see it in 1.3.15 !

Done, I've just merged the attached patch into the master branch. Now people building for the unoptimized generic target will have to explicitly ask for it.

> Thanks again for your software, I has already spared me many
> ServerIron nightmares in just a few weeks...

What I find essential is that it solves problems for users. If this is the case for you, then I'm happy :-)

regards,
Willy

Received on 2008/03/11 06:43

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2008/03/11 06:45 CET