Willy/John,
Thank you guys so much!!! :-)
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:25:52AM -0400, Lauro, John wrote:
>> I am new to haproxy, so I could be wrong... but I think it's because >> the conn timeouts don't apply to the data transfer portion, and are >> for initial connection and maybe headers. The other timeouts would be >> reset after every packet, and 284k would take 180 or so chunks of >> data.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 2007/11/04 19:21 CET